Academic Integrity: tutoring, explanations, and feedback — we don’t complete graded work or submit on a student’s behalf.

An experimenter wishes to compare the sales of two restaurants. She randomly sel

ID: 3073899 • Letter: A

Question

An experimenter wishes to compare the sales of two restaurants. She randomly selected eleven days from last year for both restaurants and recorded the sales of each restaurant on those days. The output from Excel is below:

t-Test: Two-Sample Assuming unequal Variances

Restaurant 1

Restaurant 2

Mean

30

55

Variance

353.6552

1657.742

Observations

11

11

Pooled Variance

1000

Hypothesized Mean Difference

0

df

20

t Stat

-2.03541

P(T<=t) two-tail

0.055277

t Critical two-tail

2.085963

What do you conclude from the above analysis?

There is NOT enough evidence to support that the mean sales in Restaurant 1 is LESS THAN the mean sales in Restaurant 2.

There is enough evidence to support that the mean sales in Restaurant 1 is EQUAL TO the mean sales in Restaurant 2.

There is enough evidence to support that the mean sales in Restaurant 1 is GREATER THAN the mean sales in Restaurant 2

There is NOT enough evidence to support that the mean sales in Restaurant 1 is   EQUAL TO the mean sales in Restaurant 2.

t-Test: Two-Sample Assuming unequal Variances

Restaurant 1

Restaurant 2

Mean

30

55

Variance

353.6552

1657.742

Observations

11

11

Pooled Variance

1000

Hypothesized Mean Difference

0

df

20

t Stat

-2.03541

P(T<=t) two-tail

0.055277

t Critical two-tail

2.085963

Explanation / Answer

if t stat < - t crtical or tstat> t critical

we reject the null hypothesis.

but here, -2.085963< -2.03541< 2.085963

So, we accept the null hypothesis

There is enough evidence to support the mean sales in Restaurant 1 is equal to the mean sales in Restaurant 2

Option B

Hire Me For All Your Tutoring Needs
Integrity-first tutoring: clear explanations, guidance, and feedback.
Drop an Email at
drjack9650@gmail.com
Chat Now And Get Quote