[Q7: Only answer if you ABSOLUTELY know how to solve AND the answers match up ((
ID: 3311218 • Letter: #
Question
[Q7: Only answer if you ABSOLUTELY know how to solve AND the answers match up ((tired of getting wrong replies.) So, please make sure you’re really certain. [It’s appreciated.])
Really Explain EACH STEP, including any formulas you used (& how to use the formula), and explain how to compute with a TI-84 preferably/when possible.]
NO JUST POSTING THE ANSWER WITH NO EXPLANATION/ NO CONVINCING EXPLANATION, I WILL ASSUME IT'S WRONG, AS HAS BEEN THE CASE BEFORE. IF YOU'RE THIS TYPE, MOVE ON.
Question
Question options:
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
1)
I: -0.329, II: 0.804.2)
I: 0.329, II: 1.804.3)
I: -0.804, II: 0.329.4)
I: 0.329, II: -0.804.5)
I: 0.671, II: -0.804. 11% fell Plot II o oboExplanation / Answer
The second graph clearly shows that there is a high negative correlation.
As the x values increase, the y values are decreasing. Hence the pearson coefficient in this case should be -.804
The second graph is not showing much of proper correlation. But little positive correlation exists.
Thus the possible answer for this is .329
Option 4
Related Questions
drjack9650@gmail.com
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.