Note: Respond To All Questions Highlighted (all data needed was attached below q

Question

Note: Respond To All Questions Highlighted (all data needed was attached below question. Sorry for long information and it's all data needed) Please Include All Components In The Parenthesis For Conclusion. Thanks you.

Write a conlusion (Please Included these components conclusion: Make appropriate inferences based on t or the evidence. Uses the analysis of information as the basis for deep and thoughtful judgments, drawing insightful, carefully qualified conclusions from this work. Clearly links evidence with the conclusion and the original hypothesis. Considers limitations of the study. Presents implications and possible future research

Explanation / Answer

Null Hypothesis H0: The average size of L. gigantea limpets have not changed because of human interaction. That is the mean size at different sites are equal.
Alternative Hypothesis H1: The average size of L. gigantea limpets have changed because of human interaction. That is the mean size at different sites are not equal.

Interpretation and Conclusion from Anova output -
P-value is 0 which shows that we reject the null hypothesis and conclude that the mean size at different sites are not equal.
Conclusion - (The mean size of L. gigantea limpets at sites CAB1, CAB2 and CAB3 are different. This suggests that there is significant effect of human interaction on mean size of L. gigantea limpets.)

Interpretation and Conclusion from T-test output comparing CAB1 and CAB2 -
Null Hypothesis H0: The mean size at sites CAB1 and CAB2 are equal.
Alternative Hypothesis H1: The mean size at sites CAB1 and CAB2 are not equal.
Two tail P-value is 0 which shows that we reject the null hypothesis and conclude that the mean size at CAB1 and CAB2 are not equal.
One tail P-value is 0/2 = 0 which is less than the significance level of 0.05 and we conclude that the mean size at CAB1 is less than the mean size at CAB2.
Conclusion - (The mean size of L. gigantea limpets at sites CAB1 and CAB2 are significantly different. And the mean size at site CAB1 is less than the mean size at site CAB2.
This suggests that there is significant negative effect of human interaction on mean size of L. gigantea limpets. That is as human visits increases, the mean size of L. gigantea limpets decreases )

Interpretation and Conclusion from T-test output comparing CAB2 and CAB3 -
Null Hypothesis H0: The mean size at sites CAB2 and CAB3 are equal.
Alternative Hypothesis H1: The mean size at sites CAB2 and CAB3 are not equal.
Two tail P-value is 0 which shows that we reject the null hypothesis and conclude that the mean size at CAB2 and CAB3 are not equal.
One tail P-value is 0/2 = 0 which is less than the significance level of 0.05 and we conclude that the mean size at CAB3 is less than the mean size at CAB2.
Conclusion - (The mean size of L. gigantea limpets at sites CAB2 and CAB3 are significantly different. And the mean size at site CAB3 is less than the mean size at site CAB2.
This suggests that there is significant positive effect of human interaction on mean size of L. gigantea limpets. That is as human visits increases, the mean size of L. gigantea limpets increases )

Interpretation and Conclusion from T-test output comparing CAB1 and CAB3 -
Null Hypothesis H0: The mean size at sites CAB1 and CAB3 are equal.
Alternative Hypothesis H1: The mean size at sites CAB1 and CAB3 are not equal.
Two tail P-value is 0.625 which shows that we fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that the mean size at CAB1 and CAB3 are equal.
One tail P-value is 0.625/2 = 0.3125 which is greater than the significance level of 0.05 and we conclude that the mean size at CAB1 and CAB3 are equal.
Conclusion - (The mean size of L. gigantea limpets at sites CAB1 and CAB3 are significantly equal.
This suggests that the mean size of L. gigantea limpets is same on no visits or when the visits is 30,00 each year.)

Final conclusion - From all the previous conclusions, it can be deduced that the the mean size of L. gigantea limpets is at the peak when the number of visits is medium (ariung 10,00 visits).
The mea size of L. gigantea limpets decreases significantly, when the visits decreases from 10,00 or increases from 10,00 each year.

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse N
• Subjects

---

---

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.