A certain chemical pollutant in the Genesee River has been constant for several
ID: 3385824 • Letter: A
Question
A certain chemical pollutant in the Genesee River has been constant for several years with mean 34 ppm (parts per million) and standard deviation 8 ppm. A group of factory representatives whose companies discharge liquids into the river is now claiming that they have lowered the average with improved filtration devices. A group of environmentalists will test to see if this is true at the 4% level of significance. Assume that their sample of size 50 gives a mean of 32.5 ppm. Perform a hypothesis at the 4% level of significance and state your decision. a. H0: b. H alpha: c. Test Statistic: Check assumptions. d. Calculate the test statistic: e. p-value: f. Decision: Reject or Do Not Reject the null hypothesis, H0. g. Conclusion in context of the problem:Explanation / Answer
a)
Formulating the null and alternative hypotheses,
Ho: u >= 34
b)
Ha: u < 34
c)
We use Z STATISTIC, as n > 30.
d)
As we can see, this is a left tailed test.
Getting the test statistic, as
X = sample mean = 32.5
uo = hypothesized mean = 34
n = sample size = 50
s = standard deviation = 8
Thus, z = (X - uo) * sqrt(n) / s = -1.325825215 [ANSWER]
************************
E)
Also, the left tailed p value is, by table/technology,
p = 0.092448799 [ANSWER]
****************
f)
As P > 0.04, we DO NOT REJECT the null hypothesis.
*************************
G)
There is no significant evidence that the new mean concentration of the chemical pollutant in the Genesee River is less than 34 ppm. [CONCLUSION]
Related Questions
drjack9650@gmail.com
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.