Research the Microbead-Free Waters Act of 2015 and the Main Street Fairness Act

Question

Research the Microbead-Free Waters Act of 2015 and the Main Street Fairness Act (see links below) and discuss:

1. Why do you think the Microbead Act became a law so quickly (especially in our legislative system) while the Main Street Fairness Act has yet to be passed?

2. If you were a Senator, which law(s) would you have voted for/against? Explain your reasoning.

3.Do you think the Main Street Fairness Act will ever become law? Explain your position.

You’ve just graduated from college and have been offered your first “real” job at StuffMart! The HR department asks you to come in 1 week before your start date to fill out paperwork, authorize a background check, etc. You arrive to find a stack of papers and forms and start completing them when you come across a form entitled “Social Media Policies." Much to your surprise, the form contains blanks for you to fill in your login ID and passwords for all social media sites that you use (like Twitter and Facebook). Under these lines, the form explains that as an employee of StuffMart, you authorize the company to monitor your social media, authorize the company to have access to your login/passwords, and expressly agree that you will not post any negative or derogatory statements about StuffMart or its employees on any social media site. Discuss what legal issues are presented here and whether you do or don't have a constitutional basis to refuse to comply with StuffMart’s Social Media Policies. The post should be a minimum 2 paragraphs and incorporate 2 different terms/phrases from this week's constitutional reading (in all CAPS).

Microbead-Free Waters Act resources: Microbead-Free Waters Act of 2015, The Verge microbead article,

S.B. 1452 and H.R. 5660 Main Street Fairness Act resources: Main Street Fairness Act, AboutMoney article

PLEASE DON'T USE SOMETHING THAT HAS ALREADY BEEN POSTED......PLEASE BE ORIGINAL

Explanation / Answer

Answer:

Microbead Act turned into a law since it could keep the procedure which included the purposeful adding of plastic microbeads to its corrective items. This was identified with wellbeing and skin issues to the natives of the United States. So to keep this Microbead Act turned into a law for its desires having change for the natives while the Main Street Fairness Act was about deals charge accumulations for online retailers. This demonstration required for counsel and exchange with other the other 23 states. In the event that it does as such then it would have been authorized as a Law however it was the defer that had shielded it from turning into a Law in any case.
On the off chance that I were a Senator and I could vote in favor of/against laws I would vote in favor of the Microbead Act and against the Main Street Fairness Act. I would do this since I trust that national ought not need to stress over medical problems or maladies that could happen because of corrective items. Particularly ladies, they are the primary focuses for the items and it would truly hurt mankind if something happened and it was because of the states of the microbeads in the items. The Main Street Fairness Act, I would need to truly take a seat and conceptualize for motivation to follow up on it. I think with the business impose accumulations that it would or could hurt purchasers and also business benefits with the measure of duties that they are being charged.
I imagine that the Main Street Fairness Act could turn into a Law. On the off chance that every one of the 23 states met up and extremely comprehended what was happening and were prepared then yeas I trust that they would consent to make it a Law. It is hard for the states at this moment in light of the fact that not every one of the 23 states are altogether considered individuals from the streamlined deals impose venture. Be that as it may, once they are individuals then they will comprehend the venture and ideally have expectations of transforming it into a Law.

IN SPECIFIC SITUATIONS THE STATE LAWS HAS THE SPECIALIST TO OVERRULE GOVERNMENT LAWS HOWEVER IN THIS CONDITION THE ELECTED LAWS OVERRULES STATE LAWS. WITH REGARDS TO A BUSINESS' ENTITLEMENT TO REQUEST A REPRESENTATIVE'S WEB-BASED SOCIAL NETWORKING ACCOUNTS USERNAME/ID AND PASSWORDS IT OBVIOUSLY EXPRESSES THAT ALL STATES RULED AGAINST IT AND THE BUSINESS DOES NOT HAVE THE RIGHTS ANY LONGER TO REQUEST THE USERNAMES/ID AND SECRET WORD OF EMPLOYEE'S. IN ANY WAY ANY BUSINESS CAN'T ASK ANY ONE, A CLIENT, HOPEFUL, OR WORKER TO UNCOVER ANY DATA THAT NEEDS TO DO WITH THEIR ONLINE NETWORKING ACCOUNTS.

I THINK IT IS UNLAWFUL AND THAT THE CONSTITUTION STATES IN THE FIRST AND FOURTH AMENDMENT THAT NATIVES "THE PRIVILEGE TO BE FREE OF UNDESIRABLE HUNT AND SEIZURE." THAT EXPRESSES THAT IF THERE IS REASONABLE JUSTIFICATION AND SENSIBLE UNCERTAINTY THAT A NATIONAL'S WEB-BASED SOCIAL NETWORKING ACCOUNT HOLDS DATA OR CONTAINS CONFIRM OR DISREGARDS ANY LAW THEN WITHOUT A WARRANT THEN NOBODY HAS ANY PRIVATE NOR PUBIC REASON THE ASK ANYBODY, PARTICULARLY EMPLOYEE'S, TO GET TO ANY DATA ABOUT ANY OF THEIR WEB-BASED SOCIAL NETWORKING ACCOUNT USERNAMES/ID AND PASSWORDS.

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse R
• Subjects

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.