Academic Integrity: tutoring, explanations, and feedback — we don’t complete graded work or submit on a student’s behalf.

write three to five sentences responses to this post onyour own words . RE: Sect

ID: 3459409 • Letter: W

Question

write three to five sentences responses to this post onyour own words .

RE: Sect. 1 Week 14 DQ 12: Justice and access to health care

COLLAPSE

Does society have a responsibility to provide access to health care to those who lack it?

Right off the bat, my initial reaction to this question is NO WAY. Society does not have a responsibility to provide access to health care to those who lack it. I think that the health care field needs to offer services at a cost that all walks of life can afford and those who do not have insurance coverage do not need to worry about their house being taken away or where they are going to get their next meal in order to pay their medical expenses for an accident.

The more I think about this question though, I do see the need for a general amount of preventative health care that should be provided to the public, or at least have set as some sort of ruling for future medical insurance coverage at the least, where people need to be checked yearly for a general screening and their issues should be pointed out or addressed in this one visit. Taking care of issues before they become something bigger is really a big part of how health care begins to get out of hand in terms of expenses. Eventually you are just trying to manage an issues growth, when in reality, if you just addressed the issue as soon as you started to see symptoms, you may not ever have to deal with recurring problems. So I guess I am saying I take a bit of an egalitarian stance on a basic level of universal health care, where if you are human and you live within the lines of the United States border, you should be offered a minimal amount of free health care in terms of once a year general health checkups to make sure problems that come up in this visit are immediately addressed. Other than that I tend to take a libertarian stance, where you should work for your benefits, as there are only a few people who fit outside of the jurisdiction of "able bodied". Maybe make health care benefits more available in terms of anyone who works per a certain amount of hours a month should be offered a basic plan, and as they work more, they should be offered more options to add to their plans.

Explanation / Answer

Human factors in home health care involve many stakeholders: caregivers, families and friends, paid workers of various types and skill levels, employers, and communities at large, as dozens of millions of people depend on home care. Despite excellent workers and advanced technology, people are experiencing uneven quality, fragmented care and misaligned payments. Home care remains a son-in-law while health policy is focused on hospitals and other institutions, doctors, pharmacies and insurers. Despite a holistic culture, a large and dedicated workforce and valued care by recipients, home care remains poorly understood, sometimes suspicious and abstract for many decision-makers and, as they are currently organized, they have a capacity limited to controlling overall costs. All this can change.
There is a growing sense of crisis. Medicare cost about $ 500 billion in 2009 and the balance of the Medicare Hospital Insurance Fund will be reduced to zero in seven years. Without a plan to change the cost curve, the corrective options include reduced payments to suppliers, reduced coverage, higher co-payments or taxes to generate revenue equivalent to about 4% of gross domestic product in 10 years . The broader framework represents more than $ 2 trillion spent annually on health care, one-sixth of the economy, which affects the nation's ability to compete internationally. At the edge, people discuss the number of uninsured ($ 45 million) or underinsured ($ 80 million) public and private insurance options, regional cost variation, poor public health and funding. potential solutions. than any other industrialized country in health care.

At $ 57 billion in 2007, with all payers included, home care accounts for only 3% of health care. And like health care in general, home care is organized into separately funded categories, called "silos": home health agencies, hospices, medical equipment, home helpers, pharmacy managers, medical providers, and health care providers. thousands of private bureaucracies. Two key referral sources, hospitals and nursing homes, are located in clean tax and regulatory silos. Thus, funding favors discontinuous care. The rules governing the care of people with severe chronic conditions result in an uncoordinated, overly costly and dangerous delivery system that is far from patient-centered and known to fail.