Write a paper of approximately 750 words that answers the following questions: W
ID: 3463917 • Letter: W
Question
Write a paper of approximately 750 words that answers the following questions:
What are some benefits to considering the multicultural perspective in assessment and diagnosis?
What are some drawbacks to considering a multicultural perspective in assessment and diagnosis?
How may assessment and diagnosis change depending on the philosophies with which you most closely align?
Can anybody answer the last question of this better than what I already saw on here? I am not sure exactly what it is asking for.
Explanation / Answer
Note: This response is in UK English, please paste the response to MS Word and you should be able to spot discrepancies easily. You may elaborate the answer based on personal views or your classwork if necessary.
(Answer) Before a psychologist might attempt to be accepting of the orientation of their client, they might first attempt to be sensitive, yet accepting towards individuals of any and all types of differences.
In the field of anthropology, human groups are studied meticulously and extensively. In order to make sure that researchers get a glimpse of the group’s everyday life, it is essential to fit into their normal circumstances and everyday lives. Anthropology involves the life of the researcher becoming one with the lives of the members of the subject group.
This simply means that in order to understand each other, it is necessary to be open to observing and learning about different cultures. In other words, it is necessary for an individual to get to know different tangents of the world with an open mind as opposed to recklessly thwarting anything that is different from their own beliefs.
The major issue that is faced when a psychologist is presented with different cultures is that they might be wary of something that isn’t commonplace to their own environment. It isn’t necessary for us to live like anthropologists and completely be submerged in the life of an obscure tribe in an unusual part of the world. However, it is necessary for us to mimic their method of understanding. The best way to understand something is to get to know it better.
It is essential for any counsellor to conduct research from the case study of their patient in advance. Doing so would ensure that the counsellor would deal carefully with the sensitive subjects and not easily worry or scare the patient with topics that are particularly hard for them to handle.
If the patient is of a different cultural background, it becomes even more essential to have foreknowledge about the patient and the cultural connotations of their convictions. A piece of advice given to a Chinese patient could be different to that of an American patient. Considering the cultural background of the patient, their views on community living, family, individualistic culture, religion etc. the patient should have a session befitting to their beliefs.
Let us assume that there are a Chinese student and an American student whose parents want her to be a doctor. Here, we can assume that the cultural background of the subjects is able to influence their identity. The parents of both these students would prefer their child to neurotic and careful about details, schedules and perhaps even take their career a little seriously.
On the other hand, it would be preferable for a normal individual to be less anxious, calm, secure and satisfied with the way life is. This is why; the findings may be different across situations that might affect a person’s personal identity.
Even though there might be differences in diagnosis based on the ethnic background of the subject, there are still certain universal ethics that must influence personality traits. For instance, it is beneficial for an individual of any ethnic background to not have anxiety issues. Since this might lead to problems with blood pressure, stress and other problems. In such cases, it would be unwise to accommodate one’s cultural background and rather consider the fact that anxiety is bad for a human being of any culture.
Diagnosis is likely to change depending on two basic philosophies, the first in the universal ethics theory and the second is the five-factor model. Here, universal ethics would suggest that certain behavioural traits are considered ethical universally. For instance, politeness is valued in America as well as in China. On the other hand, the five-factor model is a scale of personality traits. Certain individuals might prefer these traits while others might want to change them.
The Five Factor Model aims to evaluate an individual’s personality based on the extrapolation of data from five basic markers. These markers are:
Extraversion: Enjoys spending time with other people.
Agreeableness: Cooperative, trustworthy and good-natured
Conscientiousness: Goal-driven, thoughtful and diligent.
Neuroticism: Prone to unstable or negative emotions like anxiety.
Openness to Experience: Easily adaptable to changes in their surroundings.
The opposites on these markers are:
Carelessness: Impulsive, disorganised and reckless.
non-cooperation: Critical, non-cooperative and suspicious.
self-satisfaction: Calm, even-tempered and secure.
Closeness: A person with a mind that is generally closed to new ideas or situations.
Introversion: Prefers solitude.
Based on the level of these elements in one’s personality, a person’s personality could be roughly determined. For instance, if a person was less neurotic and a lot more self-satisfied and relaxed, he/she would be likeable and their personality would be better accepted by society. Considering that different people might prefer to have different traits, a psychologist would have to counsel their patient to change their behaviour to accommodate a trait that their client prefers. This is how different philosophies would affect the assessment and diagnosis.
Related Questions
drjack9650@gmail.com
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.