What is the difference between a cosmological argument for the existence of God

Question

What is the difference between a cosmological argument for the existence of God and an ontological argument for the existence of God? a. Ontological arguments seek to explain observable matters of fact, cosmological arguments do not b. Cosmological arguments seek to explain observable matters of fact, ontological arguments do not c. There is no difference between an ontological argument for the existence of God and a cosmological argument for the existence of God d. All of the above e. None of the above
What is the difference between a cosmological argument for the existence of God and an ontological argument for the existence of God? a. Ontological arguments seek to explain observable matters of fact, cosmological arguments do not b. Cosmological arguments seek to explain observable matters of fact, ontological arguments do not c. There is no difference between an ontological argument for the existence of God and a cosmological argument for the existence of God d. All of the above e. None of the above
What is the difference between a cosmological argument for the existence of God and an ontological argument for the existence of God? a. Ontological arguments seek to explain observable matters of fact, cosmological arguments do not b. Cosmological arguments seek to explain observable matters of fact, ontological arguments do not c. There is no difference between an ontological argument for the existence of God and a cosmological argument for the existence of God d. All of the above e. None of the above

Explanation / Answer

The ontological arguments are based on the concept of God as proof of existence while the cosmological arguments are based on a cause to prove God exists. So, the correct answer is option A.

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse W
• Subjects

---

---

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.