You must visit and spend a minimum of 2 hours at a court of your choice. While t

Question

You must visit and spend a minimum of 2 hours at a court of your choice. While traffic court is acceptable, attendance at traffic court will provide you with much less material and will be much less interesting than attendance at more formal court proceedings. During your visit, you will take notes on the types of cases being hears and the outcomes of the cases.

You paper must contain the following:

1. A description of the court you attended including the date you attended, name and address of the court, name of judge or justices presiding and a general description of the court room.

2. A summary of the cases you heard and the outcomes of the various cases.

3. A substantial discussion about the the way the cases were handled and whether you believe each cases and the overall way the cases were handled was fair.

4. A discussion about whether the court proceedings you observed were fair and just. Explain how and why you came to this conclusion. Were the court proceedings fundamentally fair? Was justice served? The paper should be a minimum of three pages, double spaced.

You CANNOT use Judge Judy or a television judge for this assignment.

Do NOT wait until the last minute to arrange your visit. Find out what days the courts around you meet and make your plans for a visit early on in case you run into a conflict with your time or there is an issue with the court and you have to reschedule.

Explanation / Answer

1. the court is traffic court where all kinds of driving violations were filed here. the place and adress is 1351 NW 12th Street, Miami, Florida 33125, 305-275-1111(Traffic),305-275-1155(Misd). the name of the judge is Fedricson Jeorge, a small room consisting of few chairs and one trial wing.

2. at the time there were few people who are there to explain their view and facts about wrong parking done at a place. the other one is about crossing the zebra line while travelling on the limits, the other one is crossed the signalling, the other one is making horn with much lowder on empty streets and creating disturbace to others.

3. yes, these cases were handled fairly only. judge listens what they told and finally he given his statement.

4. the activties are proceeded in an order only, the total cases for discussions were in the hands of the judge. he started hearing one after one with his judgements and questioning. he given sufficient time to all for explaining their viees, after listening all those he delivered the statement. i felt all it is fair and correct way only. no malpractices or unfair transactions or conditions were not there.

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse Y
• Subjects

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.