3. Distinguish between concurrent and predictive validation designs, discussing

Question

3. Distinguish between concurrent and predictive validation designs, discussing why the latter is preferred over the former. Examine each of the nine selection met cussed in this chapter and determine which of these would have their validity most and least affected by the type of validation design employed hods dis- 4. Some observers have speculated that, in addition to increasing the validity of decisions, employing rigorous selection methods has symbolic value for organizations. What message is sent to applicants about the organization through hiring practices, and how might this message be reinforced by recruitment programs that occur before selection and by training programs that occur after selection? re

Explanation / Answer

Concurrent and predictive validity are types of criterion validity. Concurrent validation is measuring the test against a benchmark test and if the correlation is high the test is considered to have strong criterion validity. Predictive validity is measuring the test with the abilities it predicts. A group of subjects are tested and which are then compared with the future results obtained at some point. Predictive validation is preferable because applicants feel more involved and motivated to give this test than the current employees who get frightened to give this test. In concurrent validation, it cannot be known the job learnings and employees capability before hiring. Also, concurrent validation has a restriction on the range due to the left of the poor performers before the result is evaluated. In this case, the correlation coefficient is lower. Through predictive validity, it can be seen that depending on the concurrent and predictive methods of how each method is different from the other.

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse 3
• Subjects

---

---

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.