Imagine you were responsible for writing the US Constitution and that you did no

Question

Imagine you were responsible for writing the US Constitution and that you did not have to compromise with anyone else. What would your government look like? What would the congressional, executive, and judicial branches look like and how would they operate? For what areas of governance would the branches be responsible? Why would this be an effective structure for the US government?

Your government can be similar to the current structure of the US government or it can be entirely different. Just be sure to explain WHY you've designed your government the way you did. Feel free to be creative! The paper must have a minimum of three (3) body paragraphs in addition to formal introduction and conclusion paragraphs. Each body paragraph must address one branch of the government (congressional, executive, judicial). If one or more of these branches would not be included in your government, explain in a paragraph WHY that branch would be omitted and how it would improve the operation of the US government.

Explanation / Answer

USA Constitution came into force in the year 1789 whereas it has been modified 27 times including an amendment to rescind the preceding one in order to convene the varying needs of a nation that has overwhelmingly changed since the eighteenth century. However expert do strongly feel there still exist lot of gaps whereas only some of which have been patched. It guarantees stalemate and simply isn't cut out for 21st-century governance.

Election is indeed the most basic function of any democracy. Whereas in USA it’s been done in the same way since the inception of Constitution as in 21st century instant-runoff voting has increasingly becoming popular because it allows voters to rank multiple choices instead of picking just one.

Australia, India, Ireland etc. already have adopted furthermore it would facilitate effectively to make room for new parties by permitting people to vote for a third-party candidate first and then for the mainstream candidate. This change would force politicians to compete for everyone's votes because they would also need non-first-choice votes.

Conventionally we could also get rid of party primaries as California did it in recent times and substitute them with unbiased runoff between the top two vote-getters. Furthermore such kind of innovation would indeed facilitate reducing one-party domination and avert the radicalizing effects of partisan primaries. Thus the process indeed can be termed to be novel as citizens eventually can directly participate by proposing legislation in an effort to efficiently structure the constitution.

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse I
• Subjects

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.