I need help in these tow question COSTMART WAREHOUSE Amy Gordon could not have b
ID: 454140 • Letter: I
Question
I need help in these tow question
COSTMART WAREHOUSE
Amy Gordon could not have been more pleased when she was first appointed as the
new inventory management supervisor for the CostMart regional warehouse. She had
previously worked part time as a clerk in the local CostMart Department Store while
she finished her university degree. After she got the degree, she was named as the
section head in charge of roughly one-fourth of the store. Now, a year later, she
started to wonder about that old adage, “Be careful what you ask for—you just might
get it.”
Background
One constant problem Amy had complained about when she was head clerk was the
difficulties she had with the warehouse replenishing supplies for her areas of responsibility.
She was sure the problem was not hers. The store used point-of-sale terminals,
in which the cash register doubled as a computer, instantly recognizing inventory
movement. She also realized that shoplifting and other forms of loss were a constant
problem in retail stores, so she instructed all her clerks to spot count inventory in their
areas of responsibility whenever there was a “lull” in store traffic. The store computer
had a built-in program to suggest replenishment orders when the stock reduced to a
certain quantity. Amy had learned, of course, that these were only suggestions, since
she knew that some items were “faddish” and would have to be ordered sooner or not
reordered at all depending on how the fad was progressing. Some items were seasonal
in nature, which needed to be accommodated, and she was also aware when an item
would go on sale or have a special promotional campaign. These were announced well
in advance during the monthly managerial meetings, and she had good estimates as to
the projected impact on demand.
It was because she was so effective at managing the inventory in her area that
she was so vocal about the problems at the warehouse. It seemed that almost everything
she ordered for replenishment from the warehouse was a problem. Some items
were late, occasionally by as many as six weeks. Other items were replenished in
quantities far larger or smaller than what was ordered, even if they were occasionally
delivered on time. It finally seemed to her that every warehouse delivery was a random
event instead of the accurate filling of her orders. Her complaints to general
management stemmed from the impact of the warehouse problems. Customers in her
area were complaining more often and louder as stockouts of various items became a
pattern. Several customers had vowed to never again shop at CostMart because of
their frustration. One customer even physically dragged Amy over to the sign above
the entrance to the store—the one that proclaims “CostMart—Where Customer
Service Is in Charge”—and suggested that she could be sued for false advertising.
In other cases, the quantity delivered was two to three times the amount she
ordered. She would often have to hold special “unannounced sales” to avoid being
burdened with the excessive inventory, especially since one of her performance
metrics was inventory dollars. Of course, one of the major performance metrics was
profitability, and both the stockouts and unannounced sales impacted that adversely.
Finally, after one particularly frustrating day, she told the general manager, “Maybe
you should put me in charge of the inventory over at the warehouse. I can control my
own area here—I bet I could put that place back in shape pretty fast!” Two weeks
later, she was notified she was “promoted” to inventory management supervisor for
the warehouse.
The Current Situation
One of the first issues Amy faced was some not-so-subtle resentment from the warehouse
general supervisor, Henry “Hank” Anderson. Hank had been a supervisor for
over 10 years, having worked his way up from an entry-level handler position. The
inventory supervisor position had been created specifically for Amy—Hank had previously
had responsibility for the inventory. Their mutual boss had explained to Hank
that the reduction in overall responsibility was not a demotion, in that growth in the
warehouse made splitting the responsibilities a necessity. Although Hank outwardly
acknowledged the explanation, everyone knew that in reality he felt the change was a
“slap in the face.” That would normally be enough to cause some potential resentment,
but in addition, as Hank expressed in the lunchroom one day, “It’s not enough
that they take some of my job away, but then look who they give it to—a young, inexperienced
college kid, and a female at that! Everyone knows you can’t learn how to
run a warehouse in some stupid college classroom—you have to live it and breathe it
to really understand it.”
Amy knew that the Hank situation was one she would have to work on, but in
the meantime she had to understand how things were run, and specifically why the
warehouse was causing all the problems she experienced at the store. Her first stop
was to talk to Jane Dawson, who was responsible for processing orders from the
store. Jane explained the situation from her perspective.
“I realize how much it must have bothered you to see how your store requests
were processed here, but it frustrates me too. I tried to group orders to prioritize due
dates and still have a full truckload to send to the store, but I was constantly having
problems thrown back at me. Sometimes I was told the warehouse couldn’t find the
inventory. Other times I was told that the quantity you ordered was less than a full
box, and they couldn’t (or wouldn’t) split the box up, so they were sending the full
box. Then they would find something they couldn’t find when it was ordered a long
time ago, so now that they found it they were sending it. That order would, of course,
take up so much room in the truck that something else had to be left behind to be
shipped later. Those problems, in combination with true inventory shortages from
supplier-missed shipments always seems to put us behind and never able to ship what
we are supposed to. None of this seemed to bother Hank too much. Maybe you can
do something to change the situation.”
Amy’s concern with what Jane told her was increased when she asked Jane if
she knew the accuracy of their inventory records and was told that she wasn’t sure,
but the records were probably no more than 50% accurate. How can that be? Amy
asked herself. She knew they had recently installed a new computer system to handle
profitability, and both the stockouts and unannounced sales impacted that adversely.
Finally, after one particularly frustrating day, she told the general manager, “Maybe
you should put me in charge of the inventory over at the warehouse. I can control my
own area here—I bet I could put that place back in shape pretty fast!” Two weeks
later, she was notified she was “promoted” to inventory management supervisor for
the warehouse.
The Current Situation
One of the first issues Amy faced was some not-so-subtle resentment from the warehouse
general supervisor, Henry “Hank” Anderson. Hank had been a supervisor for
over 10 years, having worked his way up from an entry-level handler position. The
inventory supervisor position had been created specifically for Amy—Hank had previously
had responsibility for the inventory. Their mutual boss had explained to Hank
that the reduction in overall responsibility was not a demotion, in that growth in the
warehouse made splitting the responsibilities a necessity. Although Hank outwardly
acknowledged the explanation, everyone knew that in reality he felt the change was a
“slap in the face.” That would normally be enough to cause some potential resentment,
but in addition, as Hank expressed in the lunchroom one day, “It’s not enough
that they take some of my job away, but then look who they give it to—a young, inexperienced
college kid, and a female at that! Everyone knows you can’t learn how to
run a warehouse in some stupid college classroom—you have to live it and breathe it
to really understand it.”
Amy knew that the Hank situation was one she would have to work on, but in
the meantime she had to understand how things were run, and specifically why the
warehouse was causing all the problems she experienced at the store. Her first stop
was to talk to Jane Dawson, who was responsible for processing orders from the
store. Jane explained the situation from her perspective.
“I realize how much it must have bothered you to see how your store requests
were processed here, but it frustrates me too. I tried to group orders to prioritize due
dates and still have a full truckload to send to the store, but I was constantly having
problems thrown back at me. Sometimes I was told the warehouse couldn’t find the
inventory. Other times I was told that the quantity you ordered was less than a full
box, and they couldn’t (or wouldn’t) split the box up, so they were sending the full
box. Then they would find something they couldn’t find when it was ordered a long
time ago, so now that they found it they were sending it. That order would, of course,
take up so much room in the truck that something else had to be left behind to be
shipped later. Those problems, in combination with true inventory shortages from
supplier-missed shipments always seems to put us behind and never able to ship what
we are supposed to. None of this seemed to bother Hank too much. Maybe you can
do something to change the situation.”
Amy’s concern with what Jane told her was increased when she asked Jane if
she knew the accuracy of their inventory records and was told that she wasn’t sure,
but the records were probably no more than 50% accurate. How can that be? Amy
asked herself. She knew they had recently installed a new computer system to handle
At least by this point Amy had a better perspective about the problems.
Unfortunately, it was now up to her to fix them. She wished she had never opened her
mouth to complain about the problems. Too late for that—she now had to develop a
strategy to deal with what she had been handed.
Case Analysis
3. Develop a model of how you think the warehouse should work in this environment
4. Develop a time-phased plan to move from the present situation to the model you developed
in question 3.
Explanation / Answer
3. Develop a model of how you think the warehouse should work in this environment
MODEL FOR COSTMART
Improve Inventory Record Accuracy
As mansion in case study main reason for inaccurate order replenishment was inaccuracy ininventory recording. In order to improve in inventory record system, inventory over supply must be stopped.
To reduce inventory record accuracy following areas must be considered
Communication between departments
Communication between departments is very poor. Employees are not aware of the problemsfaced by other department. To reduce this problem integration of all process in very important. In thisregard employee should share their problems and try to build team.
They need to secure the inventory and not allow unrestricted access, such as wasindicated by field service technicians “grabbing parts”. Inventory specialists in asecure environment must control all transactions.
To make sure all users have trust and faith in the formal system, the transactionsystem and associated inventory records need to be constantly checked andcorrected. A formal cycle count system clearly is in order.
The inventory system needs to become part of the overall planning activity,including purchasing and design.
In combination with true inventory shortages from supplier-missed shipments always seems to put us behind and never able to ship what we are supposed to. None of this seemed to bother Hank too much. Maybe you can do something to change the situation.
4. Develop a time-phased plan to move from the present situation to the model you developedin question 3.
Warehouse management system refers to the management of goods basically finished goods and concerned with storage and movement of materials to the end users.
Upon approval of the initial project charter, the project team developed a detailed project scope statement, work breakdown structure, project schedule, and time-phased cost estimates (project budget). The documents were combined into a project management plan, presented to the project sponsors, approved, and saved as a project baseline. The project baseline is “the approved project management plan plus approved changes” (Schwalbe, 2006, p. Glossary-1).. Now that the project team had an approved project plan, they could move forward with executing the project tasks. However, during project execution, reality does not always align nicely with the project plan, and project managers must make changes to the plan in order to achieve project success. “Every project is constrained in different ways by its scope, time [schedule], and cost goals” (Schwalbe, 2006, p. 7). In order to effectively manage projects, project managers must understand how changes to the triple constraints impact the project and implement strategies to manage baseline changes.
The cost baseline is a “time-phased budget that is used as a basis against which to measure, monitor, and control overall cost performance on the project.” (PMBOK, 2004, chap. 7.2.3.1). Many factors can affect the cost performance of a project. During the planning phase, the project team will create cost estimates for each task. However, the true costs of certain tasks may not be known. In addition, depending on the timeframe for task execution, changes to costs could occur, resulting in a variance from the original estimates. For example, during the planning for the software distribution system upgrade project, the team planned to send four people to a week-long training event. The team included travel expenses in the estimate using current flight, hotel, and car rental information. However, based on the project schedule, the training is not scheduled to occur for three months. Increases in flight or hotel costs could directly impact the overall cost of the project.
n order to ensure changes to the project scope, schedule, and cost baselines are properly considered, project teams should use a formal change control process. A change control process involves “identifying, evaluating, and managing changes throughout the project life cycle” (Schwalbe, 2006, p. 151). Unmanaged changes can quickly cause a project to spiral out of control. The information technology group at my company uses a formal process for submitting and obtaining approval for changes to project scope. The change request must include a description of the change, the reason for the change, and the impact on project schedule and cost baselines. The change request is reviewed by the project sponsors and key stakeholders. Once approved, the project schedule and costs are updated and a new project baseline is established. However, the changes to project schedule or costs at my company do not always follow the same structured process.
This responsibility includes identification of the movement, timing, and sequence of deploying and redeploying forces in the time-phased force and deployment data (TPFDD), reception and integration of units and materiel arriving in theater, and assisting these units as required
Planning for redeployment should be considered throughout the operation and is best accomplished in the same time-phased process in which deployment was accomplished. In all cases, mission requirements of a specific operation Deployment and Redeployment Planning III-9 define the scope, duration, and scale of both deployment and redeployment operation planning. Unity of effort is paramount, since both deployment and redeployment operations involve numerous commands, agencies, and functional processes
In the Planning Phase, the team defines the solution in detail what to build, how to build it, who will build it, and when it will be built. During this phase the team works through the design process to create the solution architecture and design, writes the functional specification, and prepares work plans, cost estimates, and schedules for the various deliverables.
The Planning Phase culminates in the Project Plans Approved Milestone, indicating that the project team, customer, and key project stakeholders agree on the details of the plans. Plans prepared by team members for areas such as communications, test, and security, are rolled up into a master plan that the program manager coordinates. The team's goal during this phase is to document the solution to a degree that the team can produce and deploy the solution in a timely and cost-effective manner. These documents are considered living documents, meaning they will be updated continuously throughout the Planning Phase.
Diligent work in the Planning Phase, which often involves several iterations of plans and schedules, should mitigate risks and increase chances for success. The team continues to identify all risks throughout the phase, and it addresses new risks as they emerge.
The tasks summarized in Table 3.1 need to be completed during the Planning Phase. This project guide describes the processes and roles required to accomplish them. Detailed information specific to each migration project about each task, especially technical information, is provided in the migration guide for that project.
Developing the solution design and architecture begins with a design process, the results of which become the functional specification. The design process prepares the team members for their responsibilities during the Developing Phase by building upon the vision the team developed and business requirements gathered during the Envisioning Phase. The design process gives the team a systematic way to work from abstract concepts down to specific technical detail by developing a conceptual, logical, and physical design for the solution. These are not three separate design processes, but are more properly thought of as three overlapping stages of a design continuum.
Related Questions
drjack9650@gmail.com
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.