IS THIS A CORRECT INTERPRETATION OF THE DATA? *Output2 [Document2] =M SPSS Stati

Question

IS THIS A CORRECT INTERPRETATION OF THE DATA?

*Output2 [Document2] =M SPSS Statistics V File Edit View Data Transform Insert Format Analyze Graphs Utilities Extensions Window Help HAQD na 30k 2 + + - = | % of Total 42.0% 58.0% 100.0% - Chi-Square Tests Asymptotic Significance Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1- Value df (2-sided) sided) sided) Pearson Chi-Square 12.977a .000 Continuity Correction 12.484 12.484 1 .000 .000 Likelihood Ratio 12.789 12.789 1 .000 000 Fisher's Exact Test .000 .000 Linear-by-Linear 12.973 12.973 1 .000 .000 Association N of Valid Cases 3281 a. O cells (0.0%) have expected countless than 5. The minimum expected count is 96.95 b. Computed only for a 2x2 table - ????? Log G Crosstabs Title Notes Case Processi What kind of Chi-Square Tes Symmetric Mea L Risk Estimate Log & Logistic Regressior Title Notes Case Processi Dependent Var & Block 0: Beginn Title Classificat Variables i Variables & Block 1: Method Title Omnibus 1 Model Sun Classificat Variables i Log 6- & Logistic Regression Title - Notes - Case Processi - Dependent Var & Block 0: Beginn Title Classificat Variables i Variables & Block 1: Method … Title Omnibus 1 Model Sun Classificat . Variables i Symmetric Measures Approximate Significance Value Nominal by Nominal ..063 .000 Phi Cramer's V .000 .063 3281 N of Valid Cases Risk Estimate Value .613 95% Confidence interval Lower Upper .469 .802 .772 .679 .878 Odds Ratio for What Kind Of Cancer Melanoma (2 thru 9/1 and under) For cohort SEXVARIABLE = 1 For cohort SEXVARIABLE = 2 N of Valid Cases 1.259 1.094 1.450 3281

Explanation / Answer

Yes.

This is the correct Interpretation of the data.

Since the p-value is lessert hant the assumed level of significnace (0.05), reject our hypothesis.

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse I
• Subjects

---

---

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.