Academic Integrity: tutoring, explanations, and feedback — we don’t complete graded work or submit on a student’s behalf.

Chapter 22-5. Food Caterers, Inc., had a franchise agreement with Chicken Deligh

ID: 379503 • Letter: C

Question

Chapter 22-5.   Food Caterers, Inc., had a franchise agreement with Chicken Delight, Inc. Carfiro was employed by Food Caterers to deliver hot chicken bearing the trademark “Chicken Delight.” While making a delivery, Carfiro was involved in an accident that killed McLaughlin. In a suit naming Chicken Delight, the franchiser, as defendant, the McLaughlin estate argued that Carfiro was an agent of Chicken Delight, because Carfiro was acting for the benefit of the company. There was no evidence, however, that Carfiro was hired, paid, instructed by, or even known by Chicken Delight. The decision was for whom, and why? [See: Estate of McLaughlin v. Chicken Delight, Inc., 321 A.2d 456 (CT).]

Explanation / Answer

Out of the 30 observations, only 2 values ( 82.5 and 81.1) exceed the tolerances, or 6.67%.

Thus, it seems that the tolerances are being met: 93.33% of the output will be acceptable.

Expected process output = 93.3%

Hire Me For All Your Tutoring Needs
Integrity-first tutoring: clear explanations, guidance, and feedback.
Drop an Email at
drjack9650@gmail.com
Chat Now And Get Quote