Discuss the following questions: (Please write at least 400 words) 1. A number o

Question

Discuss the following questions: (Please write at least 400 words)

1. A number of terms are used to describe the experiences of women in leadership, among them glass ceiling, labyrinth, glass cliff and velvet ghetto. Which of these is most fitting, in your view?
2. Can you provide an example to substantiate your choice? (PLease provide a real-life example and a reference. )
3. What other metaphor(s) can you propose to describe women’s experience in organizations?
4. What do you think of Sheryl Sandberg’s answer to the issues facing women in organizations?

Explanation / Answer

As I would like to think, I trust that we utilize the biased based impediment to depict ladies in authority in the public eye. I think this is fitting since discriminatory limitation is an allegory that is utilized when there is an obstruction of how high individuals can ascend in a position. I feel this is extremely fitting, as ladies can be corrupted in the public eye as they are not male. A few ladies however, have demonstrated them wrong and have risen past the social standard, be that as it may, it is uncommon to see a lady at the leader of an organization in a CEO position. This is a solid analogy, as it suggests.

One other analogy that I think precisely portray ladies' involvement in associations is a stepping stool with broken or missing rungs. While the two people attempt to climb the stepping stool to the highest point of an association, ladies are given a stepping stool with broken or missing rungs. Ladies need to invest additional exertion and defeat obstructions, yet it is feasible for them to climb the stepping stool to the best. I think this similitude really depicted the experience of ladies in associations. I discovered Sheryl Sandberg's response to the issues confronting ladies both accommodating and nonsensical in the meantime. Sheryl disclosed that ladies need to sit at the table, make their accomplice a genuine accomplice, and not leave before they take off. While I think these thoughts are significant and offer some manners by which ladies can endeavour to prevail in associations, I don't think they fundamentally take care of the genuine issue. I believe Sheryl's discussion talked about the ways that ladies can adapt to the present condition however doesn't help with changing that condition. "Don't leave before you leave" can be important exhortation however it doesn't change the way that once a lady needs to leave for maternity, she is viewed as feeble. By the appropriate responses she gave, it appeared to me like Sheryl suspected that ladies ought to oversee making the change.

it is imperative to comprehend the development that Sandberg is calling for. an endeavour to change the thoughts, qualities, and standards presently confronting ladies in the work environment. Sandberg needs to change corporate culture with respect to ladies, and she needs to do it from the base up. Culture creation is an iterative procedure, and an association's way of life is made from the base up by the lower level of members, as observed in Jon Van Maanen's examination on Disneyland's. Sandberg's recommendation is totally coordinated at ladies working at the specialized level of partnerships, the foundational level where gainful work happens. This is the place Sandberg urges ladies to lean in and forsake smothering society. If Sandberg needs to make a culture where a goal-oriented lady isn't a creature, she initially should persuade the lady of that reality. It is these interior obstructions blocking female desire that Sandberg's way of life crusade looks to decimate.

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse D
• Subjects

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.